Darwin

Build rigorous model evaluations with qualified people.

Darwin can recruit domain-aligned evaluators, calibrate them to a rubric, run blinded overlap and adjudication, verify acceptance criteria, and settle only accepted work.

Example deals

Start from a proven structure, then let Darwin clarify the exact terms with you.

Rank model answers against a rubric

Recruit calibrated evaluators to rank 2,000 model answers against this rubric. Use blinded overlap, capture the reason for each judgment, adjudicate disagreements, and report agreement quality.

Evaluation rubric.pdfStart this goal

Build a domain benchmark

Find qualified domain contributors to write difficult benchmark tasks, pay for a calibration set first, require independent review, and secure the rights to the accepted work.

Start this goal

Grade agent trajectories

Recruit experienced reviewers to grade coding-agent trajectories for correctness, efficiency, tool use, and recovery. Require reproducible evidence for every failed grade.

Start this goal

Collect preference data

Run a blinded comparison of two models on realistic tasks with qualified reviewers. Capture preferences, confidence, rationale, and subgroup differences without revealing model identity.

Start this goal

Red-team an AI feature

Find independent testers with relevant product and safety experience. Define the allowed scope, require reproducible findings, triage severity, and verify fixes against the original cases.

Start this goal

Evaluate multilingual quality

Recruit native reviewers across the target languages, calibrate hard terms and cultural criteria, then compare accuracy, usefulness, tone, and failure patterns by market.

Start this goal

Create a regression suite

Turn recent production failures into a versioned regression set with clear expected behavior, risk tiers, scoring, and reviewer guidance, then validate it against the current model.

Start this goal

Run an expert adjudication panel

Assemble independent experts to review disputed evaluation items, disclose conflicts, compare reasoning, and return a documented final judgment with remaining uncertainty.

Start this goal